When historians get hysterical

In the age of Donald Trump, extremely achieved and well-respected liberal voices proceed to lose their collective minds — Jon Meacham, the Pulitzer Prize-winning presidential historian, seemingly amongst them.

After President Trump’s Oval Office deal with on the necessity for a wall on our Southern border, Meacham tweeted: America ought to “build a wall of steel, a wall as high as Heaven” in opposition to the circulate of immigrants, quoting Georgia Gov. Clifford Walker, at a 1924 conference of the Ku Klux Klan, then a robust drive at a time of pressure for the white working class.

Wow. A “historian” intentionally linking the present president of the United States to essentially the most vile, repugnant and reviled group in American historical past.

It needs to be famous that Meacham made no such comparability when President Barack Obama mentioned: “We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked.” Or when Hillary Clinton admitted: “I voted, when I was a senator, to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in.”

As Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell just lately burdened: “The only things that have changed between then and now are the political winds, and of course, the occupant of the White House. So this is no newfound principled objection; it’s just political spite. A partisan tantrum being prioritized over the public interest.”

Precisely. Historians ought to by no means push opinions based mostly upon “political spite” or as a part of a “partisan tantrum.” History, the reality and information ought to by no means be bent or invented to favor one political get together over the opposite or one ideology over one other.

I occur to imagine Meacham is an distinctive author who has performed some actually charming and informative work. All the extra cause to be upset to witness his now unending marketing campaign to smear Trump.

In his bestselling e-book, “The Soul of America: The Battle for Our Better Angels,” Meacham opens with a extremely opinioned and clearly private denouncement of Trump.

A e-book the Trump-hating New York Times praised by mentioning Meacham’s mindset: “Appalled by the ascendancy of Donald J. Trump, and shaken by the deadly white nationalist rallies in Charlottesville in 2017, Meacham returns to other moments in history when fear and division seemed rampant.” The Meacham-Trump narrative is now carved in granite.

Unfortunately, for those who take a look at the go-to “historians” — particularly these the main networks and CNN and MSNBC typically have on or quote — you’d see a transparent bias amongst them in favor of liberal of Democratic politicians.

Take this embarrassing alternate between “historian” Michael Beschloss and radio host Don Imus quickly after Obama’s 2008 election:

Beschloss: “This is a guy [Obama] whose IQ is off the charts.”

Imus: “Well, what is his IQ?”

Beschloss: “Pardon?”

Imus: “What is his IQ?”

Beschloss: “Uh, I would say it’s probably — he’s probably the smartest guy ever to become president.”

On what precise proof did “historian” Beschloss base his assertion? The SAT scores Obama refused to launch? The faculty transcripts he additionally stored personal? Any current IQ scores he withheld?

Despite an absence of proof, a “historian” declared Obama smarter than George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton.

True, this was only a informal radio dialog. But it sounded extra the opinion of an uninformed, star-struck teenybobber than a world-class, neutral historian.

It could be as if the Noble Peace Prize had been awarded to a just-elected Obama within the hope he would make “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” (Oh, wait — that truly occurred.)

Now, it’s one factor if the Pulitzer and Nobel committees dive into the tank for liberal and socialist points; it’s fairly one other if skilled historians be a part of them.

Some historians, in any case, and positively Hollywood filmmakers, have large platforms and large energy to affect. That’s all of the extra cause they need to by no means twist or reinvent historical past or information to mirror their private biases or smear somebody purely out of malevolence.

For the sake of us all, we’d like them to be higher than that.

Douglas MacKinnon is a former White House and Pentagon official and an writer.

Be the first to comment on "When historians get hysterical"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.