Slamming a whole generation is just lazy and cheap

I’ve modified my ideas (a little) about how we give attention to generations.

First, let me illustrate my longstanding gripe.

“I am probably the biggest fan of the millennials you’ll ever meet,” retired Navy Admiral William H. McRaven, who oversaw the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, said in a present CBS interview. “[Critics] talk about millennials being soft and pampered and entitled? Well, I’m quick to say that you’ve never seen them in a firefight in Afghanistan. … This is a fabulous generation, and anybody that worries about the future of the United States, I don’t think you need to worry.”

I can’t stand that type of dialogue.

Imagine that I said, “I am probably the biggest critic of millennials you’ll ever meet. Fans talk about millennials being brave and courageous. Well, I’m quick to say that you’ve never seen them mooching beer money in a 7-Eleven parking lot.”

This might instantly strike you as unfair — and it is! That’s the aim.

There are some 83 million millennials, outlined as Americans born between 1981 and 1996. It’s robust to generalize about a group of people this huge. Within the ranks of millennials, there are pro-life Mormons and pro-choice atheists. There are immigrants and descendants of the Mayflower settlers. Some obsess over the simplest approach to make avocado toast, and some obsess over the simplest approach to wash an M1 rifle.

I might leap on the choice to buy beer for the millennials who raided bin Laden’s compound. But some random man who was having fun with video video video games when bin Laden was taken out? He should purchase his private beer.

In totally different phrases, traits might be generalized, nevertheless, the character is formed by specific individual deeds. There is no transitive property to glory or blame. A hero in a single generation isn’t a lot much less heroic because of the misdeeds of one other individual his age. Generational pleasure is essentially the most cost-effective kind of identity politics.

On the alternative hand, it’s true that you can make some useful generalizations about different generations. There are tough as many millennials in America as there are Germans in Germany. And whereas painting “the Germans” with too broad a brush can have its pitfalls, there are nonetheless some points you presumably can say about Germans that you simply could not say about Swedes or Costa Ricans. So it is with any generation.

Joseph Sternberg, an editorial writer for The Wall Street Journal, has a new e-book, “The Theft of a Decade: How the Baby Boomers Stole the Millennials’ Economic Future.” He casts a thoughtful, nuanced and vital mild on the plight of millennials. Crucially, Sternberg does it from a center-right, pro-market perspective fairly than from the additional acquainted center-left view that normally will get mired in greater identity-politics formulations.

Millennials entered the workforce in big numbers throughout the time of the financial catastrophe of 2007-2008 and the deep recession that adopted it. That, along with insurance coverage insurance policies in areas much like housing and education pushed by allegedly self-interested little one boomers, had dire penalties for a big swath of youthful people. Entering the labor market all through an excessive downturn location a drag on lifetime earnings. Saddling your self with school mortgage debt can too.

Sternberg’s argument that millennials — whether or not or not they fought in Afghanistan or not — have legit complaints about how the system is failing them strikes me as a useful and worthwhile kind of generational stereotyping. It’s rooted in empirical data and figures.

But Sternberg’s attempt and blame the boomers for the millennials’ travails strikes me due to the improper type of generational stereotyping. And I say that as a Gen Xer for whom bashing little one boomers is a birthright.

I’ve little doubt that a variety of the protection missteps Sternberg lays on the theft of the boomers might be attributed to positive generational attitudes. (They had been the rattling hippies, in any case.) But a lot of those attitudes had been inherited from the “Greatest Generation” or earlier.

More to the aim, the insurance coverage insurance policies the boomers utilized had been hotly debated amongst boomers themselves, and just about none of them expressly argued from a wish to self-deal for his or her very personal generation on the expense of others. Just as there are millennial socialists and millennial anarcho-capitalists, there are boomers in these courses as successfully. If we’re going to assign blame — and why not? — it’s additionally helpful to put it on people who had been improper fairly than indicating a full generation of some 75 million people.

If it’s improper to demonize millennials, it’s perhaps improper to demonize the boomers, too.

Be the first to comment on "Slamming a whole generation is just lazy and cheap"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.