The abortion big Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit Wednesday to power Pennsylvania taxpayers to pay for elective abortions.
The lawsuit seeks to reverse a state legislation that prohibits Medicaid from funding elective abortions, in accordance to the AP. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the legislation in 1985.
Planned Parenthood, the Allegheny Reproductive Health Center abortion clinic, the Women’s Law Project and different pro-abortion teams concerned within the lawsuit declare the state legislation discriminates towards ladies in search of abortions, in accordance to the report.
But Maria Gallagher, legislative director for the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation, stated cash, not ladies’s well being, is on the heart of the lawsuit.
“At a time when Pennsylvania’s abortion totals are at a record low, abortion businesses are trying to capture a lucrative market to prop up their sagging industry. This is a lose-lose proposition—for taxpayers and for pregnant women,” Gallagher stated. “Poll after poll has shown that taxpayers in the U.S. do not want their tax money to be spent on abortion, period.”
The Philadelphia Inquirer stories extra:
The ban “deprives low-income women of reproductive health care” and discriminates on the idea of intercourse, stated Susan J. Frietsche, senior legal professional with the Women’s Law Project, which filed the go well with together with Planned Parenthood Federation of America and others.
Click right here to join pro-life information alerts from LifeNews.com
Federal legislation bans using federal Medicaid to cowl elective abortions, and most states have outlawed using state Medicaid funds.
Pennsylvania’s ban, enacted in 1982 and upheld by the state Supreme Court in 1985, permits protection provided that the being pregnant is attributable to rape or incest, or the abortion is required to save the lady’s life.
In different phrases, the lawsuit seeks to power taxpayers to pay for abortions for any motive up to 24 weeks. The state prohibits abortions after that time.
Sari Stevens, director of Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advocates, celebrated the lawsuit Wednesday in an announcement to supporters.
“Sixteen states, including our neighbors in New Jersey, New York, and Delaware, allow Medicaid to cover abortion,” Stevens stated. “We believe it’s time that Pennsylvania correct this decades-long injustice. All women — regardless of their health insurance status or zip code — deserve access to safe, legal abortion.”
Most states prohibit taxpayer-funded abortions, and polls persistently discover that the majority Americans oppose them. A Politico/Harvard University ballot discovered that simply 36 p.c of possible voters assist taxpayer funding for abortions, whereas 58 p.c oppose it. A brand new nationwide ballot by Marist University equally discovered that three-quarters (75 p.c) of Americans oppose taxpayer funding of abortion overseas,. Opposition to this funding contains most Republicans (94 p.c), Independents (80 p.c) and a majority of Democrats (56 p.c).
Sixteen states use taxpayer funds to pay for elective abortions via Medicaid. In November, West Virginia voters handed a constitutional modification to cease taxpayer-funded abortions of their state.
Planned Parenthood would profit massively from a win. It already is the most important abortion chain in America, performing about one third of all abortions within the U.S. Its most up-to-date annual report listed 321,384 abortions. It additionally reported reaping in about half a billion tax from hardworking Americans.
Taxpayer-funded abortions has been a key purpose of abortion activists and the Democratic Party. In 2016, the Democratic National Committee accepted a platform calling for full assist of abortion for any motive up to beginning and taxpayer funding of abortions, and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton campaigned on the problem.
Though pro-abortion Democrats now management the U.S. House, a invoice to power taxpayers to fund abortions nearly actually wouldn’t move the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate or be accepted by President Donald Trump. So, because the abortion business usually does, it turns to activist judges to push its radical pro-abortion agenda.