I’ve already written extensively about my views on immigration.
It’s good for the nation and for the monetary system. Always has been. And it’s even needed to keep away from losing Social Security. We would like additional workers paying into the system, and the demographics of our inhabitants aren’t working in our favor.
Nevertheless illegal immigration must be stopped, and by no means solely on account of there is a threat (an precise one) of people coming over the border who want to damage this nation.
Someday, I’ll have the flexibility to let you understand your complete story about what intelligence officers are afraid of.
The issue that puzzles me primarily essentially the most, however, is how people can argue in favor of “illegal” immigration. The phrase “illegal” ought to speak for itself.
We don’t allow illegal parking, or illegal medication or illegal one thing.
So I really feel proponents of open borders should try to vary the narrative by altering the phrase “illegal” to 1 factor else — “uninvited” or “undesired” or “potential” immigrants would work. Or just drop the adjective altogether.
Merely identify them immigrants. Then these of us who think about inside the rule of laws gained’t ought to stumble as to how anyone may allow one thing that’s self-described as “illegal” to occur.