Hook’s staunch message echoed that of senior administration officers Pompeo and nationwide safety advisor John Bolton, who’ve lengthy held a tough line on Iran and until December had pledged a long-term U.S. presence in Syria with the intention of each countering the Islamic State and pushing again on Iranian army exercise there.
The policymakers have needed to change tack since Trump’s shock announcement on December 19 to tug all U.S. forces out of Syria. Now, diplomats insist that whereas they plan to hold by Trump’s determination, the mission to expel Iran from Syria stays unchanged.
Critics of the withdrawal transfer warn that IS is not totally defeated, and that leaving so abruptly would imply abandoning native allies, particularly Syrian Kurdish fighters, which have carried the brunt of the bottom combat towards IS alongside U.S. forces. Allies have been left confused as to the administration’s coverage targets within the area.
At the identical time, many senior officers within the Middle East and regional consultants alike say that regardless of Washington’s guarantees, the concept of Iran and its proxy forces really leaving Syria is inconceivable.
To that notion, Hook was defiant.
“Well, we don’t listen to the council of defeatism,” he stated. “If we always listened to our critics, we wouldn’t be getting very far in foreign policy.”