No Oprah! Haven’t we learned our lesson with celebrity candidates? -

No Oprah! Haven’t we learned our lesson with celebrity candidates?

No Oprah! Haven’t we learned our lesson with celebrity candidates?




Have we discovered nothing?

One speech on the Golden Globes — admittedly a barn-burner — and right here comes the drumbeat for a billionaire movie star with no governing expertise to run for president.

“I’m on the bus with Oprah,” Jimmy Kimmel mentioned.

“I need her to run for president,” mentioned Meryl Streep.

“She’s working,” tweeted former “Hamilton” star Leslie Odom Jr. “A brand new day is on the way in which.”

Even a serious community endorsed her. “Nothing however respect for OUR future president,” learn a tweet on NBC’s verified account (since deleted).

Oprah, who till Sunday evening insisted she would by no means run for president — “I’ll by no means run for public workplace,” she advised The Hollywood Reporter in October — is outwardly having second ideas.

“It’s as much as the folks,’” her accomplice Stedman Graham advised the L.A. Occasions. “She would completely do it.”

She ought to completely not.

Sure, Winfrey is a singular presence within the tradition. She is solely self-made and a decades-long mover in tv, movie, publishing and philanthropy. As of 2017, she was one among solely two girls on Forbes’s Black Feminine Billionaires record. There may be a lot to admire.

However none of this makes her match to be chief of the free world. And simply because the precedent has been set with Trump — to horrible impact — doesn’t imply the Democrats ought to run a charismatic movie star with zero credentials. Not Tom Hanks, not The Rock, not Oprah Winfrey.

If this sobering yr has taught us something, it’s that have, mind and stability, whereas hardly electrifying, ought to matter. A run for the White Home ought to by no means once more resemble a actuality present. If the Democrats need to run because the adults within the room, they need to lose their starstruck notions of President Oprah — who, by way of a long time of public life, has revealed a startling stage of gullibility and greed.

A run for the White Home ought to by no means once more resemble a actuality present.

On her eponymous daytime discuss present — which ran from 1986 to 2011 — Winfrey routinely endorsed pretend science and non secular hucksters. She forged herself as America’s foremost secular deity and appears to nonetheless imagine it. Logic and purpose don’t information Oprah Winfrey; emotions and cash do.

In 2006, Winfrey endorsed one of the vital anti-intellectual merchandise of the last decade: A e-book and video referred to as “The Secret,” which guarantees that anybody can have something they need so long as they visualize it. Conversely, if tragedy or poverty befall you, it’s your fault. “The Secret” went on to promote 20 million copies internationally.

“I’m thrilled for the success of ‘The Secret,’ ” Winfrey advised Larry King in 2007. “I believe that the message must go additional . . . it is vitally true that the way in which you assume creates actuality for your self.”

That very same yr, a lady named Kim Tinkham appeared on Winfrey’s present. She had been identified with Stage Three breast most cancers however had seen the episode touting “The Secret,” and determined to forego chemo in favor of optimistic pondering. Whereas Winfrey inspired her to think about Western drugs as properly, Tinkham declined.

She died in 2010.

Winfrey additionally gave a platform to Jenny McCarthy, the previous Playboy Playmate-turned-vocal-anti-vaxxer. In her 2007 look, McCarthy claimed that her then-toddler’s son autism was brought on by a measles, mumps and rubella vaccination — an entirely unproved and unscientific assertion, one Winfrey largely ceded to her visitor.

Jenny McCarthyGetty Photographs“My science is known as Evan, and he’s at house,” McCarthy mentioned. “That’s my science.”

That’s truly the other of science — it’s an anecdotal assumption — however Winfrey left that assertion unchallenged, making McCarthy a daily visitor and signing her to a chat present deal.

Different Oprah-backed grifters embrace Dr. Phil, who has been accused of exploiting his weak company and abusing his office workers, all below the guise of being America’s folksy shrink; Dr. Oz, accused by colleagues at Columbia College of selling “quack therapies” and referred to as earlier than the Senate to clarify identical; Suzanne Somers, a ’70s sitcom star-turned-bioidentical-hormone-huckster; and no scarcity of New Age gurus, most notable Eckhart Tolle, who has made hundreds of thousands preaching the obscure comforts of “The Energy of Now.”

But for all Winfrey’s non secular looking, at her core she’s deeply materialistic. “Oprah’s Favourite Issues” started as a vacation section on her present — one famous for her viewers erupting in hysteria over their items.

Her record lives on in her journal, and the lady with a so-called widespread contact extra intently resembles a recession-deaf, Gwyneth-style elite right here. Her 2015 record included a Three-piece set of cheese knives for $425 and a $120 field of 23-karat gold-leafed goodies. The entire worth added as much as $12,700.52.

Oprah, it seems, is as relatable as Trump. Her greed is limitless. As lately as 2014, Winfrey headlined a tour referred to as “The Life You Need Weekend,” charging as much as $999 for a VIP improve.

As of at the moment, Forbes estimates her web value at $2.eight billion.

“Thanks on your cash,” Winfrey advised a crowd in Michigan upon departing. “I understand how arduous you all work.”

Winfrey’s materialism extends to her Management Academy for Ladies, which she based in South Africa over the federal government’s issues that the power was too lavish, too elite and neglectful of the nation’s largely poor youngsters. (Solely 152 ladies have been admitted.) She spent $40 million constructing a faculty that features a magnificence salon, yoga studio, 200-thread-count sheets and expansive closets, regardless that the women have been so poor they owned only a few garments.

Winfrey didn’t care. “These ladies should be surrounded by magnificence,” she proclaimed, “and wonder does encourage.”

Inside months of its 2007 opening, Winfrey’s college was embroiled in a toddler abuse scandal, with a minimum of 15 ladies claiming they have been victimized. In 2011, the useless physique of a new child was discovered on college grounds, delivered by a 17-year-old scholar.

For all her good intentions, it appears she threw hundreds of thousands of at a deep, seemingly intractable drawback and walked away.

“I’ve all the time believed within the ladies,” Winfrey advised CNN in 2012. “I’ve recognized that it doesn’t matter what we’re going by way of, the women have been value it.”

If she runs as a Democrat in 2020, Winfrey might be referred to as to reply one among her most controversial statements, a uncommon one which brushes up in opposition to public coverage and social stigma: Why she hasn’t invested in educating America’s neediest.

“I turned so pissed off with visiting inner-city colleges that I simply stopped going,” she advised Newsweek in 2007. “The sense that that you must be taught simply isn’t there. If you happen to ask the youngsters what they need or want, they’ll say an iPod or some sneakers. In South Africa, they don’t ask for cash or toys. They ask for uniforms to allow them to go to highschool.”

What occurs when Oprah explains that assertion to the Dems’ most impactful bloc: black voters?