When the #MeToo movement goes too far

When the #MeToo movement goes too far

Already the knives are out for President Trump’s tweet on Saturday after two of his aides misplaced their jobs over allegations of spousal abuse.

“Peoples lives are being shattered and destroyed by a mere allegation,” Trump wrote. “Some are true and a few are false. Some are previous and a few are new. There isn’t a restoration for somebody falsely accused — life and profession are gone. Is there no such factor any longer as Due Course of?”

“GOP squirms,” claimed the New York Instances, due to Trump’s behavior of creating “inflammatory and insensitive remarks.”

Inflammatory and insensitive? You imply just like the remarks of Instances editor and columnist Bari Weiss, who on “Actual Time with Invoice Maher” Friday evening echoed the president’s discomfort over features of the #Metoo motion?

“The laborious left is principally saying it’s OK if a number of harmless males go down with the ship if that’s what it takes to deliver down the patriarchy,” Weiss stated. “They hate zero tolerance on the best relating to drug coverage however they love zero tolerance relating to sexual misconduct.”

There’s nothing inflammatory or insensitive, and even conservative or liberal, about fearing a modern-day Salem.

Think about, of all individuals, Lena Dunham. After she defended a “Women” author accused of sexually assaulting an actress, Dunham was excoriated. It didn’t matter that he was her buddy, how may she imagine him? Dunham was compelled to apologize for the sin of pondering there is likely to be two sides to a narrative.

There are many predators, like Harvey Weinstein, for whom the proof is compelling, contemptible and overwhelming. However there are additionally these like Harold Ford Jr. who adamantly denies sexually harassing anybody — but he was
nonetheless fired from his job at Morgan Stanley. Even when
he’s vindicated, the place does he go to get his repute again?

Aziz Ansari was accused publicly not of rape however of a foul sexual encounter. When he was advised to cease he did, however he ought to have — in accordance with the author — identified to cease earlier than that due to non-verbal cues. “I’ve but to learn an article that accounts for the violation of his dignity,” writes Andrew Sullivan in New York journal final week.

Sullivan additionally argues that due course of has vanished; it’s straightforward sufficient to accuse on Instagram. “We live in one other age of the Scarlet Letter.”

You don’t should assume Trump’s former employees secretary, Rob Porter, is an efficient man. The testimony of his ex-wives is convincing, and horrific. And it’s unclear why it ought to be thought of in any respect exculpatory that convincing allegations are “previous.” Credible allegations from 2010 are reportedly the explanation Porter couldn’t get a full safety clearance. The White Home shouldn’t have employed him, and mishandled his firing.

That doesn’t make Trump’s bigger level invalid. #MeToo ought to be applauded for bringing down monsters. However that doesn’t imply the accused shouldn’t be capable of defend themselves.

Be the first to comment on "When the #MeToo movement goes too far"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*