EHR interoperability for VA and DoD, who’s responsible? Lawmakers, officials can’t agree

EHR interoperability for VA and DoD, who’s responsible? Lawmakers, officials can't agree

The Interagency Program Workplace (IPO) has not fulfilled its authorized mandate to be the one level of accountability between the Division of Protection and Division of Veterans Affairs interoperability efforts. However each officers and lawmakers can’t determine who ought to reconcile the variations.

The inaugural Home Veterans Affairs Subcommittee on Expertise Modernization listening to, held on Thursday, revealed, not surprisingly, governance and accountability are nonetheless main factors of rivalry for the challenge.

Authorities Accountability Workplace Director of Administration Points Carol Harris testified that whereas the VA has signed the contract with Cerner, created a program administration workplace and drafted high-level governance plans — program officers haven’t designated “what function, if any, IPO is to have within the governance course of.”

Rep. Jim Banks, R-Indiana, supported Harris, remarking that the IPO is “one of many few points of EHR modernization mandated by regulation.” He additionally burdened IPO’s governance function within the initiatives was not solely vital — however everlasting.

The departments have to make clear the IPO’s powers, which was established in 2008 to not solely oversee the preliminary EHR collaboration — it gave them authority to resolve these variations, mentioned Banks.

“My hope is DoD and VA will hash out what that appears like and are available to mutual settlement,” Banks mentioned. “I’m keen to present them further time to try this, however I can’t wait without end.”

GAO is recommending the VA clearly define the function IPO could have over the EHR challenge, particularly round governance, as “specializing in a single level of accountability is essential in transferring ahead to be sure that interoperability is purposeful,” mentioned Harris.

However the VA Workplace of EHR Modernization Workplace’s performing Chief Data Officer John Windom instructed the committee that he doesn’t imagine IPO has any decision-making authority of his workplace.

And IPO Director Lauren Thompson identified that her workplace isn’t outfitted to be the one level of accountability for VA-EHR interoperability, citing a scarcity of authority, assets and employees.

“At this cut-off date, we don’t have the decision-making authority,” mentioned Thompson.

However Harris continued to press that the regulation makes IPO the “single level of accountability, in order that would come with accountability, authority and decision-making.” In reality, the testimonies of each Windom and Thompson are in battle with the statute’s expectations.

Additional, Harris burdened that each DoD and VA have ignored GAO recommendation over time on empowering the IPO. The function must be clearly outlined, comparable to by way of Congress, which may relieve the workplace of its authorized obligations.

“If the IPO continues the best way that it’s working at this time, we’re going to proceed to have dysfunction in transferring ahead,” Harris mentioned.

Discussions on higher governance insurance policies are ongoing, Windom testified. The conversations are overlapping with the VA rollout of its Cerner EHR. VA and DoD proceed to work by way of the info sharing roles on the companies, as nicely.

Thompson proposed governance must be damaged down into three boards. One, a purposeful governance board, would deal with disputes amongst clinicians and different healthcare staff. Two, a technology-focused governance board, would have the identical operate however for purely tech points.

The ultimate board could be solely targeted on decision-making, designed to resolve issues the opposite two boards couldn’t, mentioned Thompson.

However Windom shortly countered Thompson’s thought, and mentioned these low-ranking disputes could possibly be resolved on the bottom — with out having to contain “high-ranking employees members.”

“I can not impress upon the committee sufficient that governance needs to be profitable on the lowest doable stage,” unhappy Windom. “Issues can’t rise to the superior stage on each matter.”

Harris agreed: With that many boards concerned, accountability is “subtle so when the wheels fall off the bus you may’t level to a single entity… When everyone seems to be accountable, nobody is accountable.”

In the long run, no clear resolution was made on the listening to. Rep. Scott Peters, D-California, mentioned the problem could should be resolved by both Congress or the president, as the one level received’t be created with out assist.

Certainly, VA has struggled with each sustaining management and with governance points for the previous yr. For the reason that dismissal of former VA Secretary David Shulkin, MD in March, no less than 42 senior staffers have left the VA. The newest got here from the EHR challenge workplace itself, with the departure of its CHIO Genevieve Morris and CMO.

VA officers proceed to double down on their projected 2020 go-live of its personal pilot EHRs within the Pacific Northwest, designed to comply with the DoD rollout. However GAO may be investigating the DoD challenge, after an audit deemed the brand new system “not operationally appropriate.”

Twitter: @JF_Davis_Email the author: jessica.davis@himssmedia.com

Be the first to comment on "EHR interoperability for VA and DoD, who’s responsible? Lawmakers, officials can’t agree"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*