Feminist activists have just one purpose this 12 months: to verify abortions in all types keep authorized.
As the Supreme Court decides whether or not or to not hear a case that might finish laws requiring aborted fetuses to be buried as human beings, feminists are panicking. This could possibly be the primary abortion-related case to be heard by a conservative-leaning court docket, and the primary abortion case to be heard by Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
Creator of the Daily Show and pro-abortion activist Lizz Winstead tweeted on Jan. 11, “Today SCOTUS decides whether it will hear an Indiana case requiring mandatory cremation/ burial for abortions AND miscarriages based on “dignity of personhood” If they take it, & determine medical waste is an individual, ROE IS DEAD. PLEASE PAY ATTENTION.”
Winstead callously calls unborn youngsters “medical waste.” Her group, the Lady Parts Justice League, created a video attacking one of many “real batshit extremists behind” the legislation. According to the group, “One of the most recent proposed unconstitutional scams mandates the burial of all fetal tissue from miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, and abortions performed in all medical facilities.”
This legislation was handed as when Vice President Mike Pence was governor of Indiana. It’s acquired a lot resistance from Planned Parenthood and abortion activists.
Other feminist media personalities joined in with their criticism of the case. CNN columnist Danielle Campoamor tweeted, “Dear Scotus, Fetal tissue is not a person. Fetal tissue is not a person. Fetal tissue is not a person. Fetal tissue is not a person. Fetal tissue is not a person. But I am. And I matter more than fetal tissue. Signed, people who have miscarriages and abortions.”
REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to achieve tons of of 1000’s of pro-life readers each week. Contact us as we speak.
People who’ve miscarriages don’t select the demise of their infants, Danielle. There’s a distinction.
As of Jan. 11, SCOTUS had not introduced whether or not or not the case can be taken up. Broadly, a feminist department of Vice Media, wrote, “Reproductive rights activists know well what’s at stake, both in terms of the Indiana case and the potential abortion related cases the Supreme Court may hear in the near future.”
LifeNews Note: Corinne Weaver writes for Newsbusters, the place this initially appeared.